Traditional spamming consists of sending out an extremely high frequency of emails from a spam-hosted account. In the early days of the Internet, the was an extremely profitable, though illegal, business model. However, the Internet has developed to a point where this practice is no longer viable. This doesn’t mean the Internet will soon be saved from spammers, but rather that spamming will soon take on a different form. The fundamental question is, why has traditional spamming declined? The second is, how will spam change to adapt to the new Internet.
In 1997, spamming was an extremely profitable business. However, in the past 14 years, the Internet has become an increasingly difficult place for spammers to navigate. The amount of hardware and time needed to run an active spamming operation outweighs the profit. This means that spamming is more expensive than it’s worth and, with all things considered, a business model that manages to lose money. Currently, traditional spamming would pay less money per hour than a minimum wage job.
While traditional spamming is no longer worth the money, spammers are a crafty bunch, known for adapting to new environments. In what ways will spammers change in order to once again make money?
Regular spamming was known for mass emails. This is a kind of blunt force approach. Now, these messages are routed subversively. Spammers are beginning to utilize classic hacking techniques. Legitimate email accounts are being hacked, and lower frequencies of spam messages are being sent from them. This technique was recently used on actor Simon Pegg, causing over 1 million readers to receive a spam link from one of his accounts.
While there will always be a security answer to new spamming techniques, the best way to protect yourself is through personal diligence. Always be wary of a suspicious link, even if it is sent from a trusted account. Be mindful of any suspicious Internet activity that you encounter and do your best to stay ahead of spammers’ tricks. For more information on how spamming is evolving, make sure to read this article.
Search the site
- ~ Partner at Lipscomb, Eisenberg & Baker, PL
"Armando set up the IT systems at our law firm. It's was a complex 80K job and he did it extremely well. He also maintains our system. Over the years, I have come to rely upon and trust Armando's judgment. Indeed, he is one of those unique vendors who offers a personal touch and who puts relationships first. While frequently asked, I don't write many of these recommendations; but, here is the bottom line: You'd be a fool not to hire Armando and his company - M. Keith Lipscomb - March 31,"
- Read more testimonials »
- Tiny robots are diving deeper to learn more about history’s most notable shipwrecks. fb.me/3S1eBgFo1 1 year ago
- A.I. learns to rule in human rights cases with 79% accuracy. bit.ly/2eo52oA 1 year ago
- The #1 way to protect your data is through detection. Preventative maintenance fixes small issues before they… fb.me/5omrF2vUn 1 year ago
- This unit came in last night after midnight. The hard drive looked pretty chewed up so we… instagram.com/p/BMO25BTjHep/ 1 year ago
- Drones vs. Robots. Which one would you want delivering your packages? fb.me/470Hc5Oa8 1 year ago